Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Balwant Vasantrav Jadhav Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Balwant Vasantrav Jadhav Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) 148 Appeal Filed Late by 148 Days  – CIT(A) Dismissed Appeal in Limine — Tribunal Says Merits Must Be Examined u/s 250(6) Assessee, an individual, faced reassessment u/s 147 r.w.s.144 & 144B for AY 2015-16, resulting in additions on 22.03.2023. Assessee filed appeal before CIT(A) with a delay of 148 days. Reasons stated in Form 35 included limited education (12th pass), lack of knowledge of tax laws, not being computer-savvy, & unawareness of the assessment order until receipt of a departmental letter dated 17.08.2023. CIT(A), howeve...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031