This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Why AO should not be directed to pay interest on delayed refund from his own pocket: HC
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Tata Projects Limited Vs DCIT (Bombay high Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Bombay High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Tata Projects Limited Vs DCIT (Bombay high Court)
In this case HC has directed that Within two weeks from today, respondent no.4 and respondent no.5 (not below the rank of Assistant Director of Income Tax) shall file an affidavit in reply and serve a copy thereof explaining why the refund is not being issued. Respondent nos.4 and 5 shall also explain why the concerned officer, who is delaying the refund, should not be penalized in as much as why he should not be directed to pay the interest from his pocket on the refund. We note this because though petitioner will be getting refund with 6% i...
