Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Girish Karamshi Dedhia Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Girish Karamshi Dedhia Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) AO Can’t Cry ‘SBN Violation’ to Tax Genuine Sales – Demonetisation or Not – Once Sales Are in the Books, You Can’t Tax the Cash Twice You Accepted Sales, You Accepted Profit; But You Taxed the Cash? ITAT Says NO- Section 69A Cannot Override Logic ITAT Mumbai deletes addition on demonetisation cash deposits – Once cash sales & books are accepted, Section 69A cannot be invoked merely due to SBN notification. Assessee, an individual running a petrol pump under the proprietorship “M/s. Autopushp”, filed his return declaring a loss....
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031