Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : PCIT Vs Sushil Kumar Sharma (Allahabad High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

PCIT Vs Sushil Kumar Sharma (Allahabad High Court)

In appeal u/s 260A Hon’ble Allahabad HC concluded that mere depositing amount in his own bank account instead of bank account of the contract signee does not attract provision of section 69A.

The assessee was engaged in the business of providing security, housekeeping, manpower supply since 2009. During FY 2016-17 assessee signed agreement with FRB (First Rand Bank) for collection of loan instalments from the micro borrowers who are thousands in number spread all over the region in Mumbai. Assessee collected monthly in

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31