Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Keshav Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO-TDS (ITAT Indore)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14 (Q-4)
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Keshav Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO-TDS (ITAT Indore)

Amendment dated 01.06.2015 in Section 200A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is prospective in nature and cannot be applied retrospectively to previous TDS instances

The ITAT Indore in Rajendra Prasad Tiwari (through Aakash Tiwari) Vs. Income Tax Department, had on 14/07/2020 brought a landmark finding on retrospective operation of amendments in Section 200A.

It held that the Department was not justified  in retrospectively levying  the

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

(+91-9632259597; rohitdubey@jmvdlegal.com) I am an advocate & Company Secretary practicing in the field of Tax, Corporate, Insolvency and security law field. I am a law graduate from Christ University Bangalore with an additional qualification of Company Secretary. I am also a registered mediato View Full Profile

My Published Posts

How Preference shares capital form part of Net worth, within statutory prescription of Companies Act, 2013? Looking around statutory prescription involved in acquiring assets of a striked off company Is Allotment Letter Adequate enough for section 54F exemption Exploring constitutes of Words ‘Oppression’ & ‘Mismanagement’ View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. AAKASH TIWARI says:

    Ratio decidendi- “fee u/s 234E of the Act was levied in the statements processed u/s 200A of the Act before 01.06.2015 i.e. before the amendment brought into effect from 01.06.2015 in section 200A of the Act thereby enabling the revenue authorities to raise demand in respect of levy of fees u/s 234E of the Act, Ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming the levy of late fees u/s 234E of the Act by the assessing officer.”

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31