Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Satish Singh (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-2019
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Satish Singh (ITAT Kolkata) Rule 46A Not Attracted Where Evidence Was Already on Record: ITAT Upholds Deletion of ₹2.75 Cr Disallowance- High-Pitched 40A(3) Disallowance Rejected: Daily Cash Payments Within Limit Held Allowable Kolkata ITAT ‘D’ Bench in ITO vs Satish Singh (ITA No.449/Kol/2025, AY 2018-19, order dated 23-12-2025) dismissed Revenue’s appeal and upheld deletion of ₹2.75 crore disallowance u/s 40A(3), holding that cash payments of salary and commission did not exceed the statutory per-day limit and that Rule 46A was not violated. The assessee, an individual enga...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Specific Charge, No Penalty: Mumbai ITAT Cancels Section 270A Levy for Defective Notice Mere Investigation Wing Alert Is Not ‘Reason to Believe’: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Reopening Liquor Trader Gets Relief as ITAT Reduces GP Rate to 3.13% & Deletes Separate Expense Disallowance From Clean Chit to Crores in Penalty: SEBI Reopens Suzlon Case and Strikes Hard ITAT Restores Section 69 Matter to AO After Ex Parte Assessment and Appeal Orders View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930