Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Satish Singh (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-2019
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
ITO Vs Satish Singh (ITAT Kolkata) Rule 46A Not Attracted Where Evidence Was Already on Record: ITAT Upholds Deletion of ₹2.75 Cr Disallowance- High-Pitched 40A(3) Disallowance Rejected: Daily Cash Payments Within Limit Held Allowable Kolkata ITAT ‘D’ Bench in ITO vs Satish Singh (ITA No.449/Kol/2025, AY 2018-19, order dated 23-12-2025) dismissed Revenue’s appeal and upheld deletion of ₹2.75 crore disallowance u/s 40A(3), holding that cash payments of salary and commission did not exceed the statutory per-day limit and that Rule 46A was not violated. The assessee, an individual enga...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Interest on Delayed Sales Tax, Service Tax & PF Payments Deductible; TDS Interest Disallowed: Patna ITAT Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031