Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dileep Kumar Dwivedi Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Dileep Kumar Dwivedi Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Reassessment Survives, Addition Doesn’t:- Explained NRE Funds & Bank Loans—ITAT Delhi Deletes Property Investment Additions Delhi ITAT ‘D’ Bench in Dileep Kumar Dwivedi vs ACIT, Ward 1(2)(2), Delhi (ITA No.347/Del/2025, AY 2015-16, order dated 23-12-2025) deleted additions relating to purchase of immovable property, holding that the source of investment stood duly explained through banking channels and loan documentation. The assessee, a non-resident US citizen, was subjected to reassessment u/s 147 on the allegation of unexplained investme...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930