Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Zuari Global Ltd. Vs Principal CIT (Bombay High Court)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Brief of the Case Bombay High Court held In the case of Zuari Global Ltd. vs. Principal CIT that it is not disputed that the matter was posted on 7.7.2015. It is also not disputed that prior to such date the appellant had only sought two adjournments. On account of some unavoidable reasons of the death in the family of the counsel of the appellant, the concerned counsel was unable to represent the appellant on the relevant date. The fact that there was a death in the family of the counsel of the appellant is not disputed by the learned Counsel appearing for the respondent. In such circumstanc...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. Nem Singh says:

    Refusing to grant adjournment ignoring the circumstantial facts and situation by the court is totally against the principle of natural justice. Further the adjournments should have been granted if defense is not objecting the request of the either party. It is a good decision of the hon’ble court.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930