Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Jain Jewellery (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

ACIT Vs Jain Jewellery (ITAT Delhi)

In the case of Jain Jewellery vs. ACIT,  ITA No. 4571/DEL/2017 (AY 2012-13) additions were made on the basis of statements of third parties regarding bogus purchases. Total amount of purchases was Rs. 20495150/-. Additions restricted to 25%  by CIT(A).  On appeal before ITAT entire additions were deleted due to the reason that department never confronted statement of its witnesses to assessee nor cross examination was given. The said case law is reproduced below :

FULL TEXT OF THE

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

I am a Chartered Accountant in Practice from last 32 years. Any one who wants to discuss something related to Income Tax can mail me at rajeevjain_ca@yahoo.com or call on 9810581427. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

P&H HC Quashes Section 148 Notice issued by AO – Only NFAC Has Authority P&H HC Quashes Section 148 Notice Issued by AO Instead of NFAC Preparing for ITR Filing for Salaried Individuals: Key Precautions & Checks TDS on annual maintenance charges for maintenance of medical equipment No Section 69A addition where cash deposits reflected as sales & accepted by Revenue View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31