Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Santosh Mehta Vs ITO (Punjab and Haryana High court)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Santosh Mehta Vs ITO (Punjab and Haryana High court)

Punjab & Haryana High Court, in Santosh Mehta vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(3), Faridabad, ruled that a reassessment notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by the jurisdictional Assessing Officer (AO) instead of the Faceless Assessing Officer (NFAC) was invalid. The petitioner challenged the notice dated 12.03.2024 for AY 2020-21 on the grounds that it was issued without jurisdiction, referring to the CBDT Circular dated 29.03.2022, which grants exclusive authority to NFAC for issuing such noti

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

I am a Chartered Accountant in Practice from last 32 years. Any one who wants to discuss something related to Income Tax can mail me at rajeevjain_ca@yahoo.com or call on 9810581427. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Correction of TDS Statements: Key Changes in Section 200(3) P&H HC Quashes Section 148 Notice Issued by AO Instead of NFAC Preparing for ITR Filing for Salaried Individuals: Key Precautions & Checks TDS on annual maintenance charges for maintenance of medical equipment No Section 69A addition where cash deposits reflected as sales & accepted by Revenue View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930