Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Santosh Mehta Vs ITO (Punjab and Haryana High court)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Santosh Mehta Vs ITO (Punjab and Haryana High court) Punjab & Haryana High Court, in Santosh Mehta vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(3), Faridabad, ruled that a reassessment notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by the jurisdictional Assessing Officer (AO) instead of the Faceless Assessing Officer (NFAC) was invalid. The petitioner challenged the notice dated 12.03.2024 for AY 2020-21 on the grounds that it was issued without jurisdiction, referring to the CBDT Circular dated 29.03.2022, which grants exclusive authority to NFAC for issuing such notices. The court relied...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

I am a Chartered Accountant in Practice from last 32 years. Any one who wants to discuss something related to Income Tax can mail me at rajeevjain_ca@yahoo.com or call on 9810581427. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Correction of TDS Statements: Key Changes in Section 200(3) P&H HC Quashes Section 148 Notice Issued by AO Instead of NFAC Preparing for ITR Filing for Salaried Individuals: Key Precautions & Checks TDS on annual maintenance charges for maintenance of medical equipment No Section 69A addition where cash deposits reflected as sales & accepted by Revenue View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930