Case Law Details
Case Name : Santosh Mehta Vs ITO (Punjab and Haryana High court)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Courts :
All High Courts Punjab and Haryana HC
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Santosh Mehta Vs ITO (Punjab and Haryana High court)
Punjab & Haryana High Court, in Santosh Mehta vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(3), Faridabad, ruled that a reassessment notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by the jurisdictional Assessing Officer (AO) instead of the Faceless Assessing Officer (NFAC) was invalid. The petitioner challenged the notice dated 12.03.2024 for AY 2020-21 on the grounds that it was issued without jurisdiction, referring to the CBDT Circular dated 29.03.2022, which grants exclusive authority to NFAC for issuing such notices. The court relied...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


