Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shri Mohanlal Haridas Purwat Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No. 4995/Mum/2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 15/07/2020
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Shri Mohanlal Haridas Purwat Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)

The issue under consideration is whether the addition for unexplained Gold made by combining the value of Gold and Silver is justified in law?

ITAT states that the Assessing Officer has started by considering the valuation of gold at the quantity of 831.74 at Rs.28,83,301 and has finally added a sum of Rs.562,400 as unexplained gold. However, it is the fact that actually the valuation of gold seized was Rs. 24,21,206. In the valuation the silver found was Rs 4,62,095. Hence the inclusion of silver valued at Rs 4,62,095 into gold ornaments and consequent addition to this extent is not sustainable. Accordingly ITAT direct the addition of Rs 4,62,095 as not justified, and the same is directed to be deleted.

FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGEMENT

1. This appeal by the assessee is directed against order of learned CIT appeal dated 06/06/2018 and pertains to assessment year 2013-14.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031