Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Addition For unexplained expenditure cannot be made on mere presumption

Case Law Details

Case Name
Seven Jewels Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2015-16
Advertisement Seven Jewels Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) As per the provisions of section 69C of the Act, in case the assessee fails to explain the source of expenditure or part thereof to the satisfaction of the AO, such expenditure shall be considered as unexplained expenditure and be deemed to be income of the assessee. In the present case, the assessee made the payments of Rs.43,97,377, on 10th March 2015 and Rs. 43,29,549, on 18th March 2015, to M/s. Artview Gems Pvt. Ltd. in respect of the diamonds purchased by the assessee. From the statement of account of the assessee issued by the HDFC Ban...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *