This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Addition For unexplained expenditure cannot be made on mere presumption
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Seven Jewels Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2015-16
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Seven Jewels Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
As per the provisions of section 69C of the Act, in case the assessee fails to explain the source of expenditure or part thereof to the satisfaction of the AO, such expenditure shall be considered as unexplained expenditure and be deemed to be income of the assessee. In the present case, the assessee made the payments of Rs.43,97,377, on 10th March 2015 and Rs. 43,29,549, on 18th March 2015, to M/s. Artview Gems Pvt. Ltd. in respect of the diamonds purchased by the assessee. From the statement of account of the assessee issued by the HDFC Ban...





