Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : V.V. Titanium Pigments Pvt Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

V.V. Titanium Pigments Pvt Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai)

Conclusion: Addition under section 68 on account of unaccounted cash receipts was not justified as AO was merely hearsay evidence carrying no evidentiary value and at the time of seizure, the excel sheets were not authenticated either by assessee company nor by the witnesses or by an authorized officer.

Held: AO made addition for AYs 2017-18 to 2019-20 for Rs.6.10 Crores which was based on seized notebooks and dairies as maintained by Manager of M/s V.V. Minerals. Assessee assailed the sa

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31