Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : V.V. Titanium Pigments Pvt Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
V.V. Titanium Pigments Pvt Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai) Conclusion: Addition under section 68 on account of unaccounted cash receipts was not justified as AO was merely hearsay evidence carrying no evidentiary value and at the time of seizure, the excel sheets were not authenticated either by assessee company nor by the witnesses or by an authorized officer. Held: AO made addition for AYs 2017-18 to 2019-20 for Rs.6.10 Crores which was based on seized notebooks and dairies as maintained by Manager of M/s V.V. Minerals. Assessee assailed the same on the ground the entries in the excel sheet did n...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930