Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sunny Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sunny Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) Conclusion: Addition of Rs.19,07,000 as unexplained money for an individual who ran a small golgappa stall was remanded back for providing an opportunity of personal hearing as both the assessment order under Section 144 as well as first appellate order under Section 250(6) were not meritorious in nature. Held: Assessee-individual ran a small golgappa stall. During the assessment Year (A.Y.) 2017-18, assessee deposited Rs.19,07,000 in his bank accounts. He  was served with notices under Section 142(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 but abstained from responding to ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930