Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sunny Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Sunny Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)

Conclusion: Addition of Rs.19,07,000 as unexplained money for an individual who ran a small golgappa stall was remanded back for providing an opportunity of personal hearing as both the assessment order under Section 144 as well as first appellate order under Section 250(6) were not meritorious in nature.

Held: Assessee-individual ran a small golgappa stall. During the assessment Year (A.Y.) 2017-18, assessee deposited Rs.19,07,000 in his bank accounts. He  was served with notices under Section 142(1) of the I

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31