Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Addition based on Fake Sale deed is not sustainable

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2017 taxguru.in 1140
Case Name
Shri Gopichand Chhabaria Vs. CIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2008- 09
Advertisement


 Shri Gopichand Chhabaria Vs. CIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)

In this case, appellant had sold a bungalow located at Survey bno.1298, T.P.Scheme 15, Final Plot No. 173. It was having land area of 1130.50 sq.meters and constructed area of 894.90 sq.meters. The appellant sold property for Rs. 3,70,00,000/-. The sale deed was registered vide entry no. 1229. The appellant was having 1/5th share in the property. Appellant shown sale consideration for Rs. 74,00,000/- (3,70,00,000 * 20%).

During the assessment proceedings under section 143(3), the AO issued a notice to the assessee that another sale deed was also registered for this property for Rs. 1.37 crores vide entry no.1231. It was mentioned in this second deed that it was executed for construction only. Appellant was never aware of this sale deed before this notice. He had neither executed such deed nor received any sale consideration for this deed. Therefore, on coming to know about this deed, he made an affidavit confirming that second sale deed was fake. He also filed civil suit and criminal suits against purchaser of the property, Umang H. Thakkar and Kanaklata Thakkar for committing fraud. Appellants submitted that he has not executed the second sale deed.

Further, in the first sale deed itself it was mentioned that deed was for land and building thereon. There cannot be another sale deed for the same building. In Civil Suit No.18 16 of 2011, which was decided on 4.1.2013, a compromise was entered into by both the parties and it was agreed by both the parties that they are not the executors of documents for Rs. 1,37,00,000/- registered vide serial no.1231 and the said document be declared as invalid, non est, illegal and not binding to the plaintiff.

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 19,237

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.