Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax Vs Vijay S. Shirodkar (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Whether where assessee invested sale proceeds of tenancy rights in specified bonds, he was entitled to deduction under section 54EC even though his wife and daughters were co-holders of said bonds? Primary requirement for claiming deduction u/s. 54EC of the Act was fulfilled in the instant case by virtue of the fact that the funds invested emanated from the sum received out of the transfer of long term capital asset and that it was invested within a specified time. In his opinion payment of the maturity proceeds to any one of the bond holders is not a material factor for deciding the ownership...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930