Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Gajanfar Ali Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Gajanfar Ali Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) Penalty Package Broken: Six Defaults Under 142(1): ITAT Says Only First One Valid—₹50,000 Penalty Deleted- Major Penalties Sent Back- Trims 271(1)(b) & Cut Down to ₹10,000 Only Assessee filed three appeals challenging penalties: ₹60,000 u/s 271(1)(b) for six non-compliances, ₹25,000 u/s 271A for failure to maintain books & ₹5,01,260 u/s 271(1)(c) for alleged concealment. CIT(A) dismissed all appeals in limine citing delay of 139 days without condonation. Before Tribunal, AR pleaded for adjudication on merits, pointing out that the quant...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930