Case Law Details
Case Name : Gajanfar Ali Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Chandigarh
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Gajanfar Ali Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Penalty Package Broken: Six Defaults Under 142(1): ITAT Says Only First One Valid—₹50,000 Penalty Deleted- Major Penalties Sent Back- Trims 271(1)(b) & Cut Down to ₹10,000 Only
Assessee filed three appeals challenging penalties: ₹60,000 u/s 271(1)(b) for six non-compliances, ₹25,000 u/s 271A for failure to maintain books & ₹5,01,260 u/s 271(1)(c) for alleged concealment. CIT(A) dismissed all appeals in limine citing delay of 139 days without condonation.
Before Tribunal, AR pleaded for adjudication on merits, pointing out that the quant...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


