Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Abhinandan Sahoo Vs Chief Commissioner of CT & GST And Others (Orissa High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Abhinandan Sahoo Vs Chief Commissioner of CT & GST And Others (Orissa High Court) Conclusion: Notifications under Section 168A need not be adjudicated in writ jurisdiction since matter could be taken before appellate forum. It may appropriately be pursued before the competent statutory authority empowered to adjudicate factual disputes under the GST Act and the Rules framed thereunder. Held: Assessee had challenged an order passed under Section 73 of the GST Act, raising a plea that the adjudication was barred by limitation despite extension notifications issued under Section 168A. However...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930