When petitioner was not a fly by night operator, why bank accounts attached: HC ask Dept

Mono Steel India Ltd. Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court)

1. Mr. Paresh Dave, learned advocate for the petitioner has submitted that for recovery of a sum of rupees three crore and odd, six bank accounts of the petitioner have been provisionally attached by issuing notices under section 83 of the Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, to the concerned banks. It

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.