Case Law Details
Case Name : Hikal Limited Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Bombay High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Hikal Limited Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court)
Bombay High Court rules on Hikal Limited petitions, holding that omission of CGST Rules 89(4B) & 96(10) without savings clauses lapses pending proceedings. Court clarifies Section 6 of General Clauses Act and Section 174(3) of CGST Act do not protect ongoing cases.
The Bombay High Court in Hikal Limited vs Union of India addressed petitions challenging the validity and effect of CGST Rules 89(4B) and 96(10)
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
Author Bio
