Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sugos Steel Traders Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST)(FAC) (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Sugos Steel Traders Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST)(FAC) (Madras High Court)

Conclusion: Assessee should  deposit 25% of the disputed tax within a period of four (4) weeks for a fresh hearing in matters engaging the discrepancies between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A returns.

Held: Assessee was a registered dealer in iron, steel, and M.S. scraps under the CGST/TNGST Act, 2017, encountered scrutiny regarding the mismatches in returns. Even after filing returns and paying taxes, discrepancies occurred in scrutiny, prompting the issuance of a show cause

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31