This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
GST payable on reimbursement received of stipend if Appellant not qualifies as pure agent
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- In re Teamlease Education Foundation (GST AAAR Karnataka)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- AAAR, AAR Karnataka, Advance Rulings
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
In re Teamlease Education Foundation (GST AAAR Karnataka)
The limited issue for determination is whether the Appellant is acting as a ‘pure agent’ of the industry partner to the extent of reimbursement received towards stipend paid to trainees as part of the training agreement.
In their appeal before AAAR, the Appellant has contended that the reimbursement received towards stipend is an expenditure incurred as a pure agent of the industry partner as per Rule 33 of the CGST Rules; that the Appellant is merely a conduit for the payment of stipend and the actual service is supplied by...
