This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
AAR refrained from answering the question raised as matter is sub-judice
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- In re Rameshwar Havelia (GST AAR Uttarakhand)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- AAR Uttarakhand, Advance Rulings
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
In re Rameshwar Havelia (GST AAR Uttarakhand)
1. This is an application under Sub-Section (1) of Section 97 of the Central Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017 and Uttarakhand State Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as CGST/SGST Act) and the rules made there under filed by M/s Rameshwar Havelia with Trade name M/s Doon Valley Logistics, 271 KA, PO- Harrawala, Kuanwala, Haridwar Road, Dehradun, Uttarakhand- 248160 (herein after referred to as the “applicant”) and registered with GSTIN -05AAMPH3802P1ZJ under the CGST Act, 2017 read with the provisions of the UKG...
ARA is wrong , it should give ruling without offending in case, where no verdict is available.