The authority held that operational services were provided to a PSU under contract. As a result, exemption for healthcare services was denied and GST was held applicable.
The AAR held that medicated toilet soap cannot claim the 5% GST rate meant for ordinary toilet soap, as its therapeutic nature places it under a separate tariff entry attracting 18% GST.
The ruling refused to admit the application, noting that the pure agent issue on electricity reimbursement had already been decided during audit. Advance ruling was barred under Section 98(2) once the matter stood concluded.
The GST Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) in Uttarakhand refused to admit an application from Stellar Cold Chain Inc., which sought a ruling on whether the storage of frozen peas is exempt from GST.
Explore whether THDCIL pays GST under Forward Charge or RCM and if UKPSVEN can have dual status as a local authority.
Explore RCM applicability for services provided by Uttarakhand Peyjal to THDC, including forward charge liability and ITC entitlement in GST context.
In Re SJVN Limited (GST AAR Uttarakhand) In the case of SJVN Limited v. GST AAR Uttarakhand, the applicant, SJVN Limited, sought an advance ruling under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) and the Uttarakhand State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (UGST Act) regarding the liability to […]
Explore the implications of GST on storage charges for frozen green peas under Notification No. 04/2022. Learn about the ruling by GST AAAR Uttarakhand.
Understand the Uttarakhand AAAR ruling on GST applicability for liquidated damages in contracts. Detailed analysis and implications for businesses.
The applicability of Goods and Services Tax (GST) on recoveries made by an entity providing food in the factory canteen has been a subject of inquiry.
