Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 8424 Results

Emails being to taxpayers for payment of interest are mere intimations & not orders

Case Name : Saha Hospitality Ltd. Vs The State of Maharashtra & Ors. (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : WP-LD-VC- NO. 112 of 2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 14/08/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (14162) Bombay High Court (1908)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

No Anti-Profiteering if NO ITC availed by Respondent in post-GST period

Case Name : Anonymous Vs Aryan Hometec Pvt. Ltd. (NAA)
Appeal Number : Case No. 54 of 2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/08/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : National Anti-Profiteering Authority (402)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

No penalty for violation of section 171 Provisions before 01.01.2020

Case Name : Shri M. Srinivas Vs Director General of Anti-Profiteering (NAA)
Appeal Number : Case No. 53 of 2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/08/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : National Anti-Profiteering Authority (402)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

GST: Penalty for Section 171(1) violation effective from 01.01.2020

Case Name : Ratish Nair Vs Man Realty Ltd. (NAA)
Appeal Number : Case No. 52/2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/08/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : National Anti-Profiteering Authority (402)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Section 171(3A) Penalty cannot be imposed retrospectively: NAA

Case Name : Pranesh Pathak Vs Bhutani International Medicos (NAA)
Appeal Number : Case No. 51/2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/08/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : National Anti-Profiteering Authority (402)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Section 171(3A) of CGST Act comes in to force w.e.f. 01.01.2020

Case Name : Ankur Jain Vs Kunj Lub Marketing Pvt. Ltd. (NAA)
Appeal Number : Case No. 50/2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/08/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : National Anti-Profiteering Authority (402)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

GST: AAR allowed ‘Trucity Developers’ to withdraw application

Case Name : In re Trucity Developers LLP (GST AAR Rajasthan)
Appeal Number : Advance Ruling No. RAJ/AAR/2020-21/09
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/08/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : AAR Rajasthan (197) Advance Rulings (3785)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

GST on bullet proof body building on motor vehicles

Case Name : In re Jeet & Jeet Glass and Chemicals Pvt. Ltd (GST AAR Rajasthan)
Appeal Number : Advance Ruling No. RAJ/AAR/2020-21/08
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/08/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : AAR Rajasthan (197) Advance Rulings (3785)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Order passed without granting Personal Hearing violates principles of natural justice

Case Name : Jansons Industries Limited Vs State Tax Officer (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P. No. 10605, 10610 & 10615 of 2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/08/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (14162) Madras High Court (1788)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Goods cannot be detained merely because Consignee mentioned as Unregistered Person in E-Way Bill

Case Name : ABCO Trades (P) LTD Vs The Assistant State Tax Officer (Kerala High Court)
Appeal Number : WP (C).No. 17377 of 2020(V)
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/08/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (14162) Kerala High Court (918)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031