Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 22473 Results

Value of building not mentioned in fixed assets hence claim of deduction of cost not allowable

Case Name : DCIT Vs A.M. Builders and Developers (ITAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 3184/Bang/2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 06/04/2023
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Courts : All ITAT (14938) ITAT Bangalore (1081)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) not leviable as error pointed out by AO was corrected before passing of order

Case Name : PCIT Vs National Textiles Corporation Ltd. (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : ITA 962/2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 22/03/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13929) Delhi High Court (3368)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Indexed cost of development not allowed on failure to substantiate the claim

Case Name : Yashpalsingh Surindersingh Matharu Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 613/PUN/2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 11/04/2023
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Courts : All ITAT (14938) ITAT Pune (714)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Forfeited amount is deductible from cost of acquisition at the time of actual transfer of asset

Case Name : Vidya Devi Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 7529/Del/2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/04/2023
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Courts : All ITAT (14938) ITAT Delhi (3704)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Addition u/s 69C merely because assessee dealt with suspected scrips is unsustainable

Case Name : ACIT Vs Munish Financial (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 2637 & 2638/MUM/2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 31/03/2023
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Courts : All ITAT (14938) ITAT Mumbai (3578)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

ITAT deletes section 271F penalty as delay was due to death of CA

Case Name : Nagarathinam Rajendran Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No.200/Chny/2023
Date of Judgement/Order : 06/04/2023
Related Assessment Year : 2014-2015
Courts : All ITAT (14938) ITAT Chennai (855)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Jurisdiction to levy penalty u/s 271(1)(c) fails for non-application of mind by AO

Case Name : Dinesh Sitaram Patil Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 56/PUN/2023
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/03/2023
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Courts : All ITAT (14938) ITAT Pune (714)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Cash deposited during demonetization: ITAT allows deduction of returned income against peak credit balance

Case Name : Jatinderpal Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Amritsar)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No. 195/Asr/2017
Date of Judgement/Order : 19/12/2019
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Courts : All ITAT (14938) ITAT Amritsar (160)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

State Govt Undertaking Employee cannot be treated as State Govt Employee for Gratuity & LTA Exemption

Case Name : Shivaram Gopal Awate Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Appeal Number : ITA No.887/PUN/2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 11/04/2023
Related Assessment Year : 2018-2019
Courts : All ITAT (14938) ITAT Pune (714)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Section 40A(3) not applies to cash payments deposited in bank account of payee

Case Name : Abhishek Saha Vs ACIT (ITAT Kolkata)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 89/Kol/2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 31/03/2023
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Courts : All ITAT (14938) ITAT Kolkata (1033)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031