Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Yashpalsingh Surindersingh Matharu Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Yashpalsingh Surindersingh Matharu Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) ITAT Pune held that claim of indexed cost of development not acceptable as assessee failed to furnish any evidence towards the same. Facts- During the course of assessment proceedings, the AO observed that the assessee had computed income under the head `Capital gains’ on transfer of certain property and claimed exemption towards long term capital gain. In such computation of capital gain, the assessee had claimed deduction of indexed cost of improvement at Rs.9,17,560/- towards development work carried out. On being called upon to substa...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930