Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Filter Judiciary

Found 3185 Results

NSDL have no jurisdiction to adjudicate claim of title in respect of demated shares

Case Name : National Securities Depository Ltd. Vs Kamlesh Shah (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : Co. Appeal No. 33 of 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 31/10/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (14162) Delhi High Court (3421)

Whether foreign airlines had abused their dominant position in terminating commission payable to travel agents?

Case Name : Travel Agents Association of India Vs Lufthansa German Airlines (Compitation Appellate Tribunal)
Appeal Number : Appeal No. 25 of 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 07/12/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Appellate Authority (36)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Abuse of dominant position cannot be alleged if other players also exist in the same market

Case Name : Kaushal K. Rana Vs DLF Commercial Complexes Ltd. (Competition Commission of India)
Appeal Number : Case No. 50 OF 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 13/12/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Supreme Court guidelines in relation to public interest litigations

Case Name : Guruvayoor Devaswom Managing Committee Vs C.K. Rajan (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : [2003] 7 SCC 546
Date of Judgement/Order :
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2389)

Upward revision of freight by railways cannot be considered as abuse of dominant position

Case Name : Mineral Enterprises Ltd. Vs Ministry of Railways, Union of India (Competition Commission of India)
Appeal Number : Case No. 47 OF 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 13/12/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Even in absence of separate proceeding alleging unfair, monopolistic or restrictive trade practice, an application for compensation u/s. 12B of MRTP Act is maintainable

Case Name : Girish Chandra Gupta Vs M/s. Uttar Pradesh Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal No. 8920 & 8921 Of 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 11/12/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2389)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Company to pay employee bonus who proved that he was employee of the company

Case Name : Connectiva Sstems India Pvt. Ltd. And Krishnendu Sengupta (Calcutta High Court)
Appeal Number : CP No. 212 of 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 07/01/2013
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (14162) Calcutta High Court (858)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Direct recruitee’s entitlement to promotion is based on year of examination and not appointment – SC

Case Name : Union of India Vs N.R. Parmar (supreme court of India)
Appeal Number : T.C. (C) NO. 91 of 2006
Date of Judgement/Order : 27/11/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2389)

HUF cannot be a partner in firm but it is competent to the manager or karta acting on behalf of the HUF to enter into a valid partnership

Case Name : Coal India Ltd. & Anr. Vs Continental & Eastern Agencies (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : RFA (OS). 37/2003
Date of Judgement/Order : 14/12/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (14162) Delhi High Court (3421)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

‘Willful defaults’ of parties under a derivative transaction with a bank are covered by RBI Master Circular

Case Name : Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. Vs Hindustan National Glass & Ind. Ltd. (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal No. 8916 TO 8918 OF 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 11/12/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2389)
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031