Company to pay employee bonus who proved that he was employee of the company

The company’s defence is dishonest and its attempt at the final hearing to create a confusion does not only not impress, but it may be good grounds for the company to be wound up on the just and equitable count. Whatever may have been the circumstances in which the letterhead of the American principal was used for the appointment letter being issued to the petitioner – sometimes the technicalities are forgotten; or, it may have been perceived that using an American company’s letterhead rather than an Indian company’s was more impressive &

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.