Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 22499 Results

DCIT Vs M/s Aban Offshore Ltd (ITAT Chennai)

Case Name : The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs M/s Aban Offshore Ltd. (ITAT Chennai)
Appeal Number : I.T.A Nos. 1542 & 1543/Mds/10
Date of Judgement/Order : 15/07/2011
Related Assessment Year : 2005- 06
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Chennai (858)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

For deriving the benefit of section 22, the occupier and the owner must be the same person and hence the benefits are not available to partners if the occupant is firm

Case Name : Shri Prodip Kumar Bothra Vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Calcutta High Court)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 742 of 2004
Date of Judgement/Order : 15/07/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Calcutta High Court (844)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Despite Less than 30 day Holding, Share Gain is STCG & not Business Profit

Case Name : Mr Hitesh Satishchandra Doshi Vs The Jt Commr of Income Tax (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 6497/Mum/2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 15/06/2011
Related Assessment Year : 2006-07
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Mumbai (3584)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Foreign travel expenditure of the spouse of the Managing Director, pursuant to the board resolution, is allowable as business expenditure

Case Name : J. K. Industries Limited Vs CIT (Calcutta High Court)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No. 649 of 2004
Date of Judgement/Order : 15/07/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Calcutta High Court (844)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Genuineness of transaction, being essentially a question of fact, cannot be lawfully raised for the first time before the Tribunal

Case Name : Hari Shankar Bhartia Vs CIT (Calcutta High Court)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No. 49 of 2003
Date of Judgement/Order : 15/07/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Calcutta High Court (844)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

The AO is bound to furnish the reasons for the issuance of the notice under s 148 within a reasonable time so that the assessee can file objections to the issuance of the notice

Case Name : Navelkar Estates Developers Vs CIT and ITO (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Writ Petition No. 379 of 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/06/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Bombay High Court (1882)

No Transfer pricing adjustment is necessary when period and basis of computation of royalty is different from comparable transactions

Case Name : M/s. Transstory (India) Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam)
Appeal Number : ITA Nos. 540/Vizag/2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 14/07/2011
Related Assessment Year : 2006- 07
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Visakhapatnam (139)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Whether, merely because Mumbai office is also involved in the business, the Hyderabad Unit cannot claim Sec 80IB benefits for manufacture of jewellery through various karigars spread across various locations?

Case Name : Addl. CIT Vs Tribhovandas Bhimji Zaveri (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 6447/Mum/2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/06/2011
Related Assessment Year : 20006-2007
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Mumbai (3584)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Business liability which may be quantified & discharged at a future date allowable if its definite

Case Name : CIT Vs Alembic Glass Industries Limited (Gujarat High Court)
Appeal Number : Tax Appeal No. 729 of 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 02/05/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Gujarat High Court (1140)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

No addition can be made under s 28(iv) in the absence of any business or profession relationships.

Case Name : Dy. CIT Vs Kaizen Commercial Pvt Ltd (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 5974/Mum/2005
Date of Judgement/Order : 10/06/2011
Related Assessment Year : 2002-2003
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Mumbai (3584)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031