Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Navelkar Estates Developers Vs CIT and ITO (Bombay High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Navelkar Estates Developers v CIT and ITO High Court of Bombay Writ Petition No. 379 of 2011S.A. Bobde and F.M. Reis, JJ Decided on: 30 June 2011 Judgment S.A. Bobde, J 1. Rule. 2. Rule returnable forthwith. 3. Heard by consent. 4. The main contention of Shri V. R. Tamba, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner is that the reasons have not been furnished to the Petitioner/Assessee for issuing notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act. Therefore, the Assessee is not in a position to file objections to the issue on notice.The learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner points out to ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930