Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 22494 Results

Tribunal can allow credit u/s. 90 which was inadvertently mentioned as ‘Advance tax’

Case Name : M/s. Tecnimont ICB Ltd. Vs. The DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : IT Appeal No. 7720 (MUM.) Of 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 23/01/2013
Related Assessment Year : 2007- 08
Courts : All ITAT (14952) ITAT Mumbai (3584)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

After accepting wife as owner of business, revenue cannot tax the income from same business as income of husband

Case Name : Commissioner of Income Tax- XI Vs Kuldeep Sood (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : IT Appeal No. 43 of 2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/01/2013
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13951) Delhi High Court (3377)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Satisfaction that undisclosed income belongs to some person other than person searched needs to be recorded by AO

Case Name : Commissioner of Income Tax Vs M/s Jyoti Salt Industries C/o Jagdish R Acharya (Gujarat High Court at Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Tax Appeal No. 1040 of 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/09/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13951) Gujarat High Court (1140)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Ignorance of law not good enough reason for condonation of delay in appeal filing

Case Name : Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited Vs Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai & Ors. (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Writ Petition No. 2158 Of 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 10/04/2013
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13951) Bombay High Court (1882)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Transfer Pricing -Domestic leg of cross-border deal, even if consequential to overseas deal by parent AE, not covered if terms not dictated by parent AE

Case Name : Kodak India Pvt. Ltd Vs. Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : , ITA No. 7349/Mum/2012
Date of Judgement/Order : , 30-04-2013
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (14952) ITAT Mumbai (3584)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Income arising on forward exchange contracts by an assessee engaged in the business of import / export must be treated as Business income and not Speculation income

Case Name : M/s. Veer Gems Vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Income-tax (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 2478/Ahd/2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 11/01/2013
Related Assessment Year : 2006- 07
Courts : All ITAT (14952) ITAT Ahmedabad (1127)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Molasses produced during manufacturing of sugar not scrap for the purpose of section 206C

Case Name : The Nawanshahar Co-op. Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Officer (ITAT Amritsar)
Appeal Number : IT Appeal Nos. 327 to 330 (Asr.) of 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 11/02/2013
Related Assessment Year : 2007- 08 to 2010- 11
Courts : All ITAT (14952) ITAT Amritsar (160)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Once AO gives effect to order of Tribunal, his successor in office had no jurisdiction to pass a fresh order

Case Name : Classic Share & Stock Broking Services Ltd. Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Writ Petition No. 343 OF 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 07/03/2013
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13951) Bombay High Court (1882)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Insertion of words ‘or assessable’ by amending section 50C is effective from 1-10-2009

Case Name : The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs R.Sugantha Ravindran (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : Tax Case (A) No. 21 of 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 06/03/2013
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13951) Madras High Court (1762)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Approval granted by STPI Director is sufficient to satisfy conditions relating to approvals u/s. 10A

Case Name : CIT Vs Technovate E Solutions Pvt Ltd (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : IT Appeal No. 100 of 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 26/02/2013
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13951) Delhi High Court (3377)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031