Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Filter Judiciary

Found 22487 Results

Mobilization advances cannot be treated as Loans & Advances and not subject to TP

Case Name : DCIT Vs. M/s. Lanco Infratech Limited (ITAT Hyderabad)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 404/Hyd/16 & 450/Hyd/16
Date of Judgement/Order : 03/05/2017
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Courts : All ITAT (14948) ITAT Hyderabad (630)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

No Penalty if Quantum Appeal been decided in favour of Assessee

Case Name : M/s. KPMG Vs Additional C.I.T. (International Taxation) (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA Nos. 4063 to 4066/Mum/2008
Date of Judgement/Order : 28/04/2017
Related Assessment Year : 2002- 03
Courts : All ITAT (14948) ITAT Mumbai (3583)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Deduction u/s 43B for EPF / ESIC paid after due date

Case Name : M.V.S Engineering Ltd Vs The CIT (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 603/2004
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/04/2017
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13946) Delhi High Court (3376)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Full Section 54F exemption despite purchase in joint name

Case Name : Shri Jitendra V Faria Vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No.6792/Mum/2016
Date of Judgement/Order : 27/04/2017
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Courts : All ITAT (14948) ITAT Mumbai (3583)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Interest cannot be disallowed without proving utilisation for non-business purposes

Case Name : DCIT Vs Sardar Baldeo Singh Bhatia (ITAT Raipur)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 136/RPR/2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 02/05/2017
Related Assessment Year : 2010- 2011
Courts : All ITAT (14948) ITAT Raipur (101)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

AO must allow benefit U/s. 54F not claimed in return but during Assessment Proceedings

Case Name : Amit Kumar Bansal Vs ITO (ITAT Raipur)
Appeal Number : ITA No.130/Rpr/2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 02/05/2017
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Courts : All ITAT (14948) ITAT Raipur (101)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

At registration stage CIT not supposed to examine Nature of Activities

Case Name : CIT (Exemption) Vs Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority (Allahabad High Court)
Appeal Number : Income Tax Appeal No. 107 of 2016
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/04/2017
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13946) Allahabad High Court (800)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Section 80HHC deduction not available on Sales Tax

Case Name : M/s. K.H. Shoes Limited Vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : Tax Case Appeal No. 731 of 2007
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/04/2017
Related Assessment Year : 1999-2000
Courts : All High Courts (13946) Madras High Court (1762)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Contractual Workers eligible for benefits under Maternity Benefits Act

Case Name : Smt. Archana Pandey Vs State of M.P and others (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : Writ Petition No. 15523 of 2016
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/04/2017
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13946) Madras High Court (1762)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

No sec 40A(2)(b) rws 36 disallowance on Trade advance given to sister concern

Case Name : CIT Vs. M/S Ghari Industries Pvt. Ltd. (Allahabad High Court)
Appeal Number : Income Tax Appeal No. 26/2017
Date of Judgement/Order : 01.03.2017
Related Assessment Year : 2006-07
Courts : All High Courts (13946) Allahabad High Court (800)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031