Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Span Divergent Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Span Divergent Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise  (CESTAT Ahmedabad) CESTAT Ahmedabad held that the appellant has failed to discharge its burden of proving that burden of duty has not been passed on to the customer. Accordingly, since incidence of the duty has been passed on to the buyers therefore, the refund is hit by the principles of unjust enrichment. Facts- The appellant are engaged in the manufacture of Diagnostic Reagents which includes products PPD 5Tu/10Tu, Packaging 5 ml, Tuberculin PPD Lyophilize 10 Tu/0.1 ml Packing 500 Tu, etc. The dispute arose regarding classification ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930