Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore-III Vs Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd.(Karnataka High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore-III V/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. N. KUMAR AND RAVI MALIMATH, JJ. C.E.A. NO. 83 OF 2010 FEBRUARY 10, 2011 ORDER 1. This appeal is preferred by the revenue challenging the interim order of stay in particular the order directing the appellant to pay 10% of the demand as security while entertaining the appeal. 2. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the Tribunal has committed a serious error in going into the merits of the appeal and in coming to the conclusion that the demand is barred by time ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

  1. C. Jyoti says:

    Which officer authorised the filing of this infructuous appeal? Is he still in his job, without any reprisals for wasting govt money and the Hon’ble High Court’s valuable time?

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930