Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Excise Appeal No. 10105 of 2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 23/06/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad)

CESTAT held that in case of PLA balance, it is not deposited as a duty but it is deposited as advance towards the duty. The PLA Amount takes the color of excise duty only when it is utilized for payment of duty on clearance of excisable goods. The unspent balance of PLA is only advance not duty therefore, Section 11B prescribing limitation is not applicable.

FULL TEXT OF THE CESTAT AHMEDABAD ORDER

The issue involved in the present case is whether the appellant is entitled for refund of unspent balance of Personal Ledger Account (PLA) due to change in taxation regime from central excise to GST with effect from 01.07.2017 and whether the limitation as provided under section 11 B is applicable in the case of refund of unspent PLA Balance.

2. Shri Mahesh Tailor, DGM (Indirect Taxation) of the appellant’s company submits that in the case of refund of PLA Balance section 11 B is not applicable. He placed reliance on the following judgments:

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031