Case Law Details
Case Name : Shri Avinash M Baliga & Others Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Delhi
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
CA Urvashi Porwal
Brief of the Case
In the case of M/s. Balajee Perfumes Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, it was held that in order to prove clandestine removal of excisable goods, the department should take reasonable steps and provide correlated corroborative evidence to prove that the assessee has made cladenstine removal of goods. Further, it was also held that the statements of the various parties should be considered in an holistic manner in order to prove the intent of the assessee in regards to clandestine removal.
Facts of the Case
The facts of the case are that on intelligence ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

