Letter F.No. 275/65/2013-CX.8A dated 19.06.2015 regarding Procedural Clarification in respect of the issues relating to the ‘authorization’ of the Commissioners to represent the Union Of India and Others in matters before the High Court.
F. No 275/65/2013-CX.8A
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Excise and Customs
New Delhi the, Dated- 19th June 2015
To,
All the Chief commissioners of Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax All the Directors General
Webmaster cbec@icegate.gov.in for uploading this on CBEC website.
Sir/ Madam
Subject: Procedural clarifications in respect of the issues relating to the “authorization” of the Commissioners to represent the Union of India and Others in matters before the High Court.
It has been noticed that there is no uniformity and clarity in respect of the procedure to be adopted by the field formations in matters relating to representation of the cases before the High Court on the behalf of Union of India (UOI) and the officers in the Ministry/ Board. Accordingly, following instructions are being issued to streamline the process of filing the counter affidavit by the Commissioner in whose name such authorization has been issued.
| Issue | Instruction | |
| a | Whether the jurisdictional Commissioner can further authorize any of his subordinates to represent the interests of UOI or officers in Ministry/ Board, after he has been authorized by the Board to represent UOI or officers in Ministry/ Board | Since the Commissioner is authorized by the Board to file affidavit on behalf of the UOI and officers in the Ministry/ Board who are joined as respondents in any petition before the High Court, Commissioner cannot further authorize any of his subordinates to represent U01 or any of these officers of the Ministry/ Board. In fact, Commissioners do not have the authority to authorize anybody else. Accordingly, Commissioner should himself sign the vakalatnama and counter affidavit in all such cases. |
| b | Procedure in respect of the petitions before the High Court where more than one Ministry/ Department are jointly made respondents. |
In case where more than one Ministry/ Department are jointly made respondent in a petition before the High Court, then the petition needs to be forwarded to the concerned Ministry/ Department for filing the counter on behalf of the said Ministry/ Department. |
| c
|
Procedure in respect of the cases where no jurisdictional officer is joined as respondents and the petition is filed against U01 and officers in Ministry/ Board | In case where in the petition filed before the High Court, no jurisdictional Commissioner/ Officer is made respondent, the authorization is issued in the name of the nodal Commissioner in whose urisdiction the bench of High Court where petition is filed, is located. As such in line with SI No (a) above, Commissioner himself should sign the counter affidavit etc on behalf of U0I or officers in Ministry/ Board after obtaining comments from them on the petition. |
| d
|
Procedure for obtaining comments on policy issues from the policy wing or the concerned sections in the Ministry/ Board for drafting the counter.
|
In case where the comments of policy wings or the concerned section in the Board/ Ministry are needed, the Commissioner in whose name the authorization is issued should obtain comments directly from the said section under intimation to legal section. On the basis of the comments so received from the policy sections in the Ministry/Board, the Commissioner who is authorized, will vet and file the counter affidavit. |
2.0 The above instructions may further be circulated amongst the officers in your jurisdiction.
3.0 Kindly acknowledge the receipt.
Yours faithfully
(Nagendra Yadav)
OSD (Legal)
