Mere possession of Foreign marking gold cannot be treated as smuggled without corroborative evidence
Case Law Details
Case Name : Rajesh Kumar Vs Commissioner of Customs (Prev.) (CESTAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Delhi
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Rajesh Kumar Vs Commissioner of Customs (Prev.) (CESTAT Delhi)
CESTAT Delhi held that mere possession of foreign marking on gold without any corroborative evidence doesn’t lead to the conclusion that it is smuggled gold.
Facts- During search 20.643 kgs. of gold of foreign origin, having total market value of Rs. 6,46,57,189/- was recovered. On enquiry Sh. Rajesh Kumar could not produce any document for legal possession of the gold and informed that the said gold was received from Sh. Amit Goel, Director of M/s Pace Commodity Brokers Pvt. Ltd., through his employee Sh. Pankaj Kumar Singh. Dur...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

