Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Purushottam Kumar Jain Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Customs Appeal No. 50303 of 2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/10/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Purushottam Kumar Jain Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi)

Penalty has been imposed under section 114A of the Customs Act, 1962. The foremost provisions are reproduced here:

 [114AA. Penalty for use of false and incorrect material

If a person knowingly or intentionally makes, signs or uses, or causes to be made, signed or used, any declaration, statement or document which is false or incorrect in any material particular, in the transaction of any business for the purposes of this Act, shall be liable to a penalty not exceeding five times the value of goods.]”

From the discussion, it stands apparently clear that the appellant has deliberately and intentionally has not provided any such information which was false or incorrect. As such, in my opinion that penalty under section 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 has wrongly been imposed upon him.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031