Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vivo Mobile India Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner, Customs (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Customs Appeal No. 51045 of 2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/10/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Vivo Mobile India Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner, Customs (CESTAT Delhi)

CESTAT Delhi held that if applicant does not claim benefit under a particular notification at initial stage, he is not debarred, prohibited or estopped from claiming such benefit at a later stage.

Facts-

The Department observed that the appellants have paid Basic Customs duty (BCD) @ 10% on Microphone for Cellular Mobile Phone classifying the same under CTH 85181000. Simultaneously, the benefit of entry at S.No. 18 of Notification No. 57/2017 dated 30.6.2017 was claimed by M/s. VMIPL, the appellants.

Department formed an opinion that, ‘Microphone for Cellular Mobile Phone’ attract Basic Customs duty @ 15% SWS @10% and IGST @18%, totaling of 37.470% duty.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031