High Court are of the view that the same is not at all a speaking order. No reasons have been assigned for rejecting the refund application of the petitioner. Assessing officer did not advert to the objections filed by the petitioner on 10.03.2022.
Telangana High Court held that the court can extend the timelines of One Time Settlement Scheme (OTS) on examination of the facts therein and also satisfying the reasons mentioned therein by the loanee.
Held that allegation of collusion between the arbitrator and the opposite party cannot be decided in an application filed under section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
HC remanded back the matter to the assessing authority for reconsidering the refund claimed by the assessee noting that refund of accumulated Input Tax Credit (ITC) on account of inverted duty structure (IDS) is allowed where the goods have been supplied under concessional rate notification.
Chenna Krishnama Charyulu Karampudi Vs Additional Commissioner Appeals (Telangana High Court) HC held that Though the lower appellate authority may be right in holding that while it may allow filing of an appeal beyond the limitation of three months for a further period of one month, therefore, by extension of limitation beyond the extended period […]
Held that any inquiry/ investigation post-filing of an application for advance ruling cannot debar the applicant from seeking advance ruling.
D. Ravinder Reddy Vs Smt. C. Geethanjali (Telangana High Court) In the present case, there is no dispute that the parties by incorporating Clause 28 had agreed to resolve their disputes through arbitration. The said clause is extracted below: “In the case of any dispute between the parties hereto touching these presents, the matter shall […]
Held that as summoning of the petitioners by the respondents would not amount to taking any coercive steps like arresting them or prosecuting them, but only to proceed forward with the investigation. Such summons not contrary to the provisions of Cr.P.C.
Court is of the view that it was an impossible situation for the respondents to have paid the lease rentals timely, particularly during the period covered by the claim of the applicants. In the circumstances, the present is not a fit case where the parties should be referred to arbitration
Symed Labs Limited Vs. Appellate Joint Commissioner of ST (Telangana High Court) HC set aside penalty levied for mismatch of vehicle number in e-way bill for stock transfer – There was mismatch between the registration number of the vehicle and the vehicle number mentioned in the e-way bill. Statement of the driver was found to […]
