The Supreme Court refused to interfere with concurrent findings of guilt, holding that revisional courts have limited powers to reappreciate evidence. It also upheld the direction that multiple sentences should run concurrently.
The Supreme Court held that disputed explanations regarding assets and loans must be examined during trial and cannot form the basis for discharge. The High Court’s order discharging the accused was set aside.
The Supreme Court held that filing Form 3AA during assessment proceedings constituted sufficient compliance, even though it was not submitted with the return. The ruling clarifies that delayed filing before the final assessment order does not automatically defeat the claim.
The Court noted that the Revenue had not submitted any claim during the insolvency resolution process for the relevant assessment years. Following established precedent, the appeals were dismissed.
The Supreme Court held that failure to offer fit-out possession within the contractually agreed period entitled homebuyers to terminate the agreement and seek a refund with interest. Consumer fora cannot override express contractual rights.
The Supreme Court held that review jurisdiction cannot be used to reargue issues already decided on merits. It found no error apparent on the face of the record and dismissed the review petition.
The Supreme Court ruled that an employee performing managerial and supervisory duties, supported by documentary evidence and job responsibilities, falls outside the definition of “workman” under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act.
The Supreme Court cancelled bail granted in a POCSO murder case, holding that the High Court failed to adequately consider the seriousness of the allegations, supporting material on record, and severity of punishment.
The Court ruled that confiscation proceedings before Customs Authorities do not amount to prosecution before a judicial tribunal. Consequently, subsequent criminal prosecution for the same act was held not to violate Article 20(2).
The Supreme Court refused anticipatory bail, holding that the High Court had rightly found prima facie material indicating involvement in the alleged liquor syndicate. The Court emphasized that serious corruption allegations warranted an unhindered investigation.
