Follow Us:

Rajasthan High Court

CA, CS, CMA authorised to present case on behalf of client under RERA

April 28, 2022 6561 Views 0 comment Print

Sanjay Ghiya Vs Union Of India (Rajasthan High Court) Rajasthan High Court held that CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS Or COMPANY SECRETARIES Or COST ACCOUNTANTS are authorised to present case on behalf of applicant or appellant or respondent before Appellate Tribunal or the Regulatory Authority or the adjudicating officer, as the case may be. HC held that Respondent” […]

GST Dept. to Reimburse Pre Deposit in View of CIRP of Binani Cement: HC

April 27, 2022 2985 Views 0 comment Print

Ultratech Nathdwara Cement Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner (Rajasthan High Court) This bunch of Sales Tax Revisions involves identical questions of facts and law and hence, the same is being decided together by a common order. These revisions have been preferred by the petitioner M/s. UltraTech Nathdwara Cement Limited for assailing the order dated 28.12.2020 passed […]

Unilateral Deposit Not Create Any Rights in Land if no Allotment letter issued

April 26, 2022 1926 Views 0 comment Print

High Court finds that merely by depositing amount unilaterally by the petitioner-firm, in absence of any allotment letter, would not create any right to claim allotment in its favour.

HC declines exemption from personal appearance under GST

April 25, 2022 3909 Views 0 comment Print

Suresh Balkrishna Jajra Vs Union of India (Rajasthan High Court) This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking direction of exemption from personal appearance pursuant to summons issued to the petitioner under Section 70 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act of 2017’) issued by Respondent […]

HC stays recovery of GST on royalty paid on account of excavation of sand for brick

April 22, 2022 4902 Views 0 comment Print

Shree Basant Bhandar Int Udyog Vs Union of India (Rajasthan High Court at Jodhpur) Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that as per the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court rendered in the case of India Cement Ltd. Etc. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Etc., reported in AIR 1990 SC 85, the royalty is […]

Settlement between Workers & Management not binding under Industrial Disputes Act If Not Sent to Prescribed Authorities

April 10, 2022 5379 Views 0 comment Print

Laxman Vs State of Rajasthan (Rajasthan High Court) The provisions of Rule 2(p), Rules 58 and 75 of the Rules, 1958 clearly reflect that for a settlement arrived at between the parties by mutual negotiations, the same has to be sent to the State Government, Labour Commissioner and the conciliation officer concerned. The provisions are […]

Reassessment provisions framed under Finance Act, 2021 cannot be deferred by CBDT notifications: HC

April 3, 2022 1185 Views 0 comment Print

Shweta Kedia Vs ITO (Rajasthan High Court) Issues: Whether after introduction of new provisions for reassessment of income by virtue of the Finance Act, 2021 with effect from 01.04.2021, substituting the then existing provisions, would the substituted provisions survive and could be used for issuing notices for reassessment for the past years and Whether the […]

Form GST ITC-02A not available on Portal: HC allows credit transfer through Form GSTR 3B

April 3, 2022 1803 Views 0 comment Print

The petitioner has raised a pertinent grievance in this writ petition that the Form GST ITC-02A was not available on the GSTN Portal for the entire period of 30 days from the registration of its separate business verticals and even till the date of filing of the instant writ petition

GST Evasion of Rs 869 Crores: HC denies bail to accused

March 31, 2022 4065 Views 0 comment Print

Sohan Singh Rao Vs Union of India (Rajasthan High Court) It is admitted position that the petitioner and Vinaykant Ameta were Director in M/s Miraj Products Private Limited. As per the prosecution story, they had evaded tax of Rs. 869 Crores. GST department had seized one truck which was being unloaded at their premises. The […]

Section 148 Assessment instead of under Section 153A/153C- HC Grants Stay

March 25, 2022 4254 Views 0 comment Print

The pertinent assertion of learned counsel Shri Gargieya is that the assessing authority could not have adopted the procedure provided under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for reopening the assessment of the petitioner because such action was taken on the basis of facts revealed to the assessing authority during the assessment of DRA Group at Ahmedabad and the proceedings, if any, would have to be conducted under Section 153A read with Section 153C of the Income Tax Act.

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031