CIT, Udaipur Vs Udaipur Dugdh Utpadak Sahakari Sangh Limited (Rajasthan High Court) While completing the assessment under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 the Assessing Officer (AO) noticed that the assessee had deposited payment of Rs.14,60,412/- in the PF fund and Rs.973/- in the ESI fund with delay that is the said payments […]
Poonamchand Saran Vs Union of India (Rajasthan High Court) It is not disputed that appeal against cancellation of the GST registration can be filed within thirty days which can be extended by a further period of 30 days. The petitioner Poonamchand Saran filed the e-appeal in time but could not submit the hard-copy. On the […]
Rajasthan High Court held rejected the writ petition filed challenging leviability of GST on royalty as matter already decided by Hon’ble Supreme Court
Assessee to satisfy the authority by submitting Crypto currency ledger to verify information as was submitted by him before AO in proceedings under Section 148A
No notice whatsoever was issued to the legal representative/s of the assessee before undertaking the reassessment proceedings. Thus, the impugned re-assessment and the assessment order having been passed against the dead assessee, is invalid and the same cannot be sustained in the eyes of law.
Held that applicant, subjected to any enquiry or investigation or audit, is not eligible to make a declaration under ‘Voluntary Disclosure’ under SVLDRS Scheme
Sonjoli Construction Co. Vs Union of India (Rajasthan High Court) Petitioner submitted that the petitioner was entitled to apply under the SVLDR Scheme and he filed the timely application and deposited the due tax amount under the said Scheme. However, application filed by the petitioner has been rejected only an erroneous ground that audit had […]
Section 148A notices of Income Tax are time barred for Assessment year (A.Y.) 2017-18, Rajasthan High Court Stays the operation of the Notice
Hemant Gokhru vs. UOI & Ors (Rajasthan High Court) Learned Senior Counsel Shri Balia assisted by Shri Priyansh Arora submits that as per first proviso to Section 149 of the Income Tax Act, the impugned notice dated 22.7.2022 issued to the petitioner under Section 148 for the assessment year 2014-2015 is without jurisdiction because it […]
Held that application u/s 7 for triggering CIRP may be initiated by a financial creditor either individually or jointly with other financial creditors with total minimum threshold for initiation of CIRP being fixed at INR 1 Crore.
