Patna High Court directed BIADA (Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority) to immediately recall the order of cancellation of allotment of impugned premises as the petitioner accepted the undertaking and accepted to pay the pending dues as per the undertaking.
Patna High Court held that bails is granted on furnishing of bails bonds as the recovery of gold biscuits-bullions is of value less than Rs. One Crore.
Patna High Court held that the Reimbursement of Seignorage Charge and Labour Cess on construction and maintenance of Akauna Path to Yogapur Path work done under NABARD should be challenged before the appropriate forum.
HC quashed ex-parte assessment order rejecting ITC claim & imposing tax as it was passed in violation of principles of natural justice
HC set aside the order of cancellation of GST Registration of the assessee and held that the cancellation of the GST Registration through a non-speaking order without mentioning the grounds for such cancellation is cryptic in nature and violates the principles of natural justice.
It is observed that vide impugned order passed by Additional Commissioner (Appeal), the appeal of the petitioner against the order passed by Assistant Commissioner of State Taxes under Section 74 of BGST Act, 2017; and summary of order in Form GST DRC-07 has been rejected without considering the points taken by the petitioner in gross violation of principles of natural justice.
Not only GST registration cancellation order is nonspeaking, but cryptic in nature and the reason of cancellation not decipherable therefrom. Principles of natural justice stand violated and the order needs to be quashed as it entails penal and pecuniary consequences.
Not only the GST Registration cancellation order is nonspeaking, but cryptic in nature and the reason of cancellation not decipherable therefrom. Principles of natural justice stand violated and the order needs to be quashed
Motiprabha Infratech Pvt. Ltd Vs Union of India (Patna High Court) Undisputedly, minimum statutory period of 30 days mandated under the provisions of Section 74(A) of CGST/BGST Act, 2017 was not afforded to the petitioner for making payment due and prior to the expiry of 30 days, the assessing officer proceeded to pass the order, […]
Not only the order is nonspeaking, but cryptic in nature and the reason of cancellation not decipherable therefrom. Principles of natural justice stand violated and the order needs to be quashed as it entails penal and pecuniary consequences.
