NCLAT Delhi held that arbitration notice evidences a pre-existing dispute, thus, section 9 application filed by Operational Creditor for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) rightly rejected.
NCLAT Delhi held that unilateral revocation of guarantee by the guarantor does not absolve him from his obligations under the guarantee agreement as the Financial Creditor has not agreed to such revocation.
NCLAT Chennai held that a right to judicial remedies is a right which is safeguarded by Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Thus, deprival of remedies available under Article 21 is unjustifiable and hence it is directed to revive back the company petition.
NCLAT Delhi held that resolution professional whose resolution plan was once rejected by the Committee of Creditors [CoC] is free to participate in fresh process initiated by fresh Form G for inviting Expression of Interest.
Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. has held that the NCLT cannot exercise its jurisdiction over matters dehors the insolvency proceedings since such matters would fall outside the realm of IBC.
Where application under section 95 of Insolvency Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016 was filed, the same was permitted to be filed by a creditor in his individual capacity or jointly with other creditors or through a Professional (RP).
NCLAT Delhi held that benefit of extension of limitation under section 19 of the Limitation Act entitled to the operational creditor since last payment was made within period of three years and the same was acknowledged in writing by Corporate Debtor.
NCLAT Chennai held that rejection of application preferred u/s. 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code [I&B Code] not justified since existence of financial debt arising out of business transaction established.
NCLAT rules that pendency of an OTS proposal does not halt personal insolvency proceedings under Section 95 against personal guarantors.
NCLAT dismissed Liquidator’s appeal in Rathi Super Steel Ltd case, ruling that seized amount adjusted before CIRP initiation is not an asset of the Corporate Debtor.
