Case Law Details
Case Name : Tajinder Singh Bhathal Vs MRF Limited (NCLAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
NCLAT
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Tajinder Singh Bhathal Vs MRF Limited (NCLAT Chennai)
NCLAT Chennai held that a right to judicial remedies is a right which is safeguarded by Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Thus, deprival of remedies available under Article 21 is unjustifiable and hence it is directed to revive back the company petition.
Facts- In the year 1987, Late Shri. Iqbal Singh Bhathal is said to have purchased 100 equity shares of MRF limited having a face value of Rs.10/- each in the name of his son, the Appellant Shri. Tejinder Singh Bhathal and Late Smt. Satwant Kaur Bhathal, mother of the Appellant.
The A...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

