Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Tajinder Singh Bhathal Vs MRF Limited (NCLAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : NCLAT
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Tajinder Singh Bhathal Vs MRF Limited (NCLAT Chennai)

NCLAT Chennai held that a right to judicial remedies is a right which is safeguarded by Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Thus, deprival of remedies available under Article 21 is unjustifiable and hence it is directed to revive back the company petition.

Facts- In the year 1987, Late Shri. Iqbal Singh Bhathal is said to have purchased 100 equity shares of MRF limited having a face value of Rs.10/- each in the name of his son, the Appellant Shri. Tejinder Singh Bhathal and Late Smt. Satwant Kaur Bha

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31