Sh. Parvez Khan Vs Pearlite Real Properties Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) It has been revealed from the DGAP’s Report that the ITC as a percentage of the turnover that was available to the Respondent during the pre-GST period (April-2016 to June-2017) was 3.02% and during the post-GST period (July-2017 to December-2018), it was 6.66% for the […]
Rajesh Shaw Vs Eden Realty Ventures Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) The Applicant No.1 Rajesh Shaw alleged that the Respondent No. 1 Eden Realty Ventures Pvt. Ltd. had not passed on the benefit of ITC to him by way of commensurate reduction in prices and charged GST @12% on the amount due to him against payments made for […]
Kundan Kumar Sinha Vs ATS Township Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) Applicant alleged profiteering by ATS Township Pvt. Ltd. in respect of purchase of a Flat No. 4032 in Tower-4 in the Respondent’s project ‘ATS Rhapsody’, situated at Plot No. GH12/1, Sector-1, Village Bisrakh, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh. The Applicant No. 1 alleged that the Respondent had not passed […]
Director General of Anti-Profiteering Vs ATS Homes Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) The brief facts of the present case, are that a reference was received by the DGAP from the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering on 15.10.2020 to conduct a detailed investigation in respect of an application filed under Rule 128 of the Central Goods and Services Tax […]
Sh. Nitin Kumar Joshi Vs GK ARPL Ventures (NAA) In the instant case, there is no reduction of rate of tax during the relevant period and the only issue which is required to be decided by the Authority as to whether Respondent is required to pass on the benefit of Input Tax Credit. As mentioned […]
Director General of Anti-Profiteering Vs J.P. and Sons (NAA) NAA has observed that the Respondent, M/s J.P. and Sons was a distributor of M/s Johnson & Johnson Pvt. Ltd. The Authority finds that M/s Johnson & Johnson Pvt. Ltd. was investigated by the DGAP for allegations of profiteering is as much he has not passed […]
Director General of Anti-Profiteering Vs Raj & Company (NAA) There is no dispute with regard to the reduction of the tax in respect of subject products supplied by the Respondent with effect from 15-11-2017. The Government by Notification No 41/2017-CT (Rate) dated 14-11-2017 has reduced rates on subject products. In view of the above said […]
Sh. Sumit Mansingka Vs E-Homes Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) The Respondent E-Homes Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. has made his detailed submissions regarding the fact that the credit of VAT for pre-GST era has been denied to him. He has also submitted copies of VAT returns and the UPVAT assessment orders for the relevant period in this regard. The […]
Vivek Gupta Vs Maheshwari Infratech Pvt Ltd (NAA) NAA held that Maheshwari Infratech Pvt Ltd has denied the benefit of ITC to the customers/flat buyers/recipients in his Project U-Faria’ in contravention of the provisions of Section 171 (1) of the CGST Act, 2017 and has committed an offence under Section 171 (3A) of the above Act. […]
It was observed that in NAA’s Order No. 57/2022, Project Ruparel Orion had actually been considered for profiteering. Hence the contention of the Respondent appears to be true and therefore this project need not be analyzed again for determination of profiteering.
