Follow Us:

National Anti-Profiteering Authority

Base Price Increase After GST Rate Cut is Profiteering: GSTAT

February 5, 2026 435 Views 0 comment Print

The Tribunal held that increasing base prices after a GST rate reduction defeated the statutory mandate of Section 171. Profiteering was confirmed as the benefit of tax reduction was not passed on to consumers.

Failure to Reduce Cinema Ticket Prices After GST Rate Cut is Profiteering: GSTAT

February 2, 2026 495 Views 0 comment Print

The case examined whether a cinema operator passed on the GST reduction on ticket prices. The Tribunal held that maintaining the same cum-tax prices by increasing base prices amounted to profiteering under Section 171.

No Profiteering as Post-GST ITC Ratio Fell Below Pre-GST Level: GSTAT

January 30, 2026 384 Views 0 comment Print

The Tribunal held that no profiteering arose where the ITC-to-cost ratio declined after GST. The key takeaway is that absence of GST-led savings defeats section 171 allegations.

GSTAT Upholds Profiteering for Non-Passing of GST Rate Cut Benefit

January 29, 2026 324 Views 0 comment Print

GSTAT upheld that the benefit of GST reduction from 28% to 18% was not passed on to consumers and directed recovery of ₹19.32 lakh as profiteering, to be deposited in Consumer Welfare Funds.

GSTAT Mandated Uniform Per-Square-Foot Benefit for All Flats in GST Profiteering Probe

January 24, 2026 294 Views 0 comment Print

The tribunal accepted an area-based methodology for computing profiteering in a housing project, rejecting turnover-linked calculations. The ruling confirms that uniform per-square-foot benefit must be passed on to all eligible buyers.

Units Sold After Occupancy Certificate cannot be included in GST Profiteering Probe

January 24, 2026 4011 Views 0 comment Print

A slight increase in post-GST ITC was held to amount to profiteering when not passed on. The tribunal directed refund of the quantified benefit with interest to eligible buyers.

GSTAT: Profiteering Allegation Rejected After Excess ITC Benefit Passed On

January 22, 2026 771 Views 0 comment Print

The Tribunal held that although profiteering was initially computed, the developer had already passed on a higher amount to the buyer. With full discharge of Section 171 obligations, proceedings were closed.

GSTAT Closes GST Profiteering Case as buyer confirmed receipt of ITC benefits

January 20, 2026 330 Views 0 comment Print

Proceedings were closed after it was confirmed that GST ITC benefits had already been passed on to flat buyers. The decision emphasizes that resolved ITC benefit disputes do not warrant continued proceedings.

No Profiteering Found Where Housing Project Is Fully Post-GST: GSTAT

January 20, 2026 252 Views 0 comment Print

An anti-profiteering complaint was dismissed after investigation showed the project started after GST implementation. The decision highlights that Section 171 does not apply without a pre-GST to post-GST comparison.

GSTAT Closed Case as No Profiteering Found Under Anti-Profiteering Law

January 20, 2026 375 Views 0 comment Print

The GST Appellate Tribunal accepted the DGAP report after finding no profiteering under Section 171 of the CGST Act. With no appearance from the complainant, the proceedings were concluded and the case was disposed of.

Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031